Penggunaan Evaluasi Diklat Model ROI Untuk Mengetahui Hasil Diklat Berdasarkan Cost-Benefit
Abstract
Evaluation is the most important thing in the implementation of training, because it reflects the level of development and progress in the quality of training results. Research methods are steps that have been systematically arranged to achieve the field of science. And the method used in this study is qualitative which is Library Research, which is research that combines library data in the form of books, journals, magazines, historical records and other literature literature. In this case, the researcher collects relevant data and then analyzes the data by reading carefully and writing it with a conclusion Evaluation of training in the ROI (return on investment) model or also known as Return on Training Investment/ROTI) is an evaluation that measures the benefits of training compared to the costs (cost-benefit). The ROI model introduces the training program evaluation stages which include 4 (four) main stages, namely: evaluation planning, data collection, data analysis, and reporting evaluation results
References
Aryanti, Teni, Supriyono, and M Ishaq. “Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Non Formal 10, no. 1 (2016): 2–12.
Athiyah, Cut N. Ummu. “Evaluasi Program Diklat Unggulan Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan 2018.” EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan 17, no. 1 (2019): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v17i1.585.
Atmanta, Dwi, and Sudji Munadi. “Evaluasi Program Diklat Peningkatan Kompetensi Bagi Guru Taman Kanak-Kanak Di LPMP D.I. Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan 1, no. 2 (2013): 141–53.
Hermawan, Rudi. “Evaluasi Program Diklat Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Pmri Di Bdk Palembang.” Jurnal Perspektif 13, no. 2 (2021): 122–28. https://doi.org/10.53746/perspektif.v13i2.30.
Inayati, Mahfida, and Ali Nurhadi. “Model Desain Program Diklat Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru PAI.” AL-AFKAR : Journal for Islamic Studies 7, no. 1 (2024): 814–28. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i1.880.Training.
Khosyiin, Muhammad Imam, and Muhammad Fakhruddin. “Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Model Kirkpatrick.” CERMIN: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Berbasis Islam Nusantara 1, no. 2 (2022): 42–46. https://ejournal.staida-krempyang.ac.id/index.php/CERMIN.
Patimah, N. “Evaluasi Dalam Manajemen Diklat.” Guru Mts Yayasan Al;Muhibbin Cadasari Pandeglang 1, no. 1 (2018): 50–68.
Prasetyo, Muhammad Anggung Manumanoso, and Agus Salim Salabi. “Model Evaluasi Dan Instrumen Program Pendidikan Pelatihan Di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam.” Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan) 5, no. 1 (2021): 101–17. https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v5i1.1608.
Rahmawati, Mahfida Inayati, and Ali Nurhadi. “Urgensi Pendekatan Dan Metode Diklat Terhadap Profesionalisme Guru PAI Di Era Society 5.0.” AL-AFKAR : Journal for Islamic Studies 7, no. 1 (2024): 1121–37. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i1.924.The.
Supriyati, Yetti, and Irfan Abraham. “Model Pengembangan Kirkpatrick Plus Level 5 ( Return on Training Invesment ) (Kirkpatrick Plus Level 5 Development Model).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education 7, no. 1 (2021): 134–43. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1712.
Syukri, Makmur, Widyatna Zakirah Meidianti, Annisa Chailana, and Awuluddin Rambe. “Evaluasi Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan (Leadership) Di Organisasi KSJ (Komunitas Sedekah Jumat).” Jurnal Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan 6, no. 2 (2022): 160–82. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/aliman/article/view/4441.
