Khalayak dalam Komunikasi Politik: Peran dan Pengaruhnya dalam Keberhasilan Proses Komunikasi
Abstract
Khalayak is commonly referred to as the recipient, the target, the reader, the listener, the viewer, the audience, the decoder, or the communicator. Khalayak is one of the elements of the communication process. Therefore, the audience should not be ignored because it does not succeed in a communication process highly determined by the audience. (Cangara, 2010: 157). For a communicator, communication can be said to be successful when a message delivered through a channel or medium can be received, understood, and interpreted positively by the target audience, in the sense that it corresponds to the expectations of the communicator. (Sendjaja, 2005: 24). According to the common sense of communication, the person to whom a message is transmitted is called the recipient, the audience, or the communicator. Nevertheless, the public is only a temporary role. At the turn of sending the message, the recipient will start sending a next message and at that point the audience has changed the role of the communicator. The same concept applies to political communication. The side that was once known as the communicator or channel, at other times can also be identified as the Khalayak is one of the elements of the communication process. Therefore, the audience should not be ignored because it does not succeed in a communication process highly determined by the audience.
References
Firmanzah. 2008. Marketing Politik: Antara Pemahaman dan Realitas. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Fitriyani, L., & Wuryandari, R. (2018). Manajemen Program Televisi Berbasis Komunitas di Daerah Perbatasan. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 1-14. (https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jk.2018.13.1.342).
Hasdiana Syafitri. Persepsi Khalayak Pada Program Competition Show Televisi Mnet Pasca Manipulasi Voting Produce X 101.
McQuail, Denis. 2010. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 6th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Morissan, M.A. 2010. Periklanan Komunikasi Pemasaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nasrullah, Rulli. 2014. Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Nasution, S. 1990. Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Putri, D., & Santosa, D. H. (2016). “Efektivitas Iklan Layanan Masyarakat Melalui Media Sosial”. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 19(1), 23-37. (https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v19i1.133).
Rivers, William L., Wilbur Schramm, Theodore L. Glasser, Bettina L. Jensen, dan James W. D. Peterson. 2003. Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Ruben, Brent D., dan Lea P. Stewart. 1998. Communication and Human Behavior. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Siregar, D., & Pane, M. 2017. Manajemen Komunikasi Politik dalam Membangun Citra Positif di Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(2), 12-23. (https://doi.org/10.24014/jik.v15i2.513).
Sudjaja. 2005. Khalayak Komunikasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Umaimah Wahid, M.Si. 2016. Komunikasi Politik Teori, Konsep Dan Aplikasi Pada Era Media Baru. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Yosua et al. “Persepsi Khalayak Pada Program Competition Show Televisi Mnet Pasca Manipulasi Voting Produce X 101”.
Yulianti, L., & Hidayat, T. 2021. “Pengaruh Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah pada Program Keluarga Harapan. Jurnal Komunikasi Global”, 12(1), 42-58. (https://doi.org/10.7454/jkg.v12i1.241).