Adaptasi Perkawinan Lintas Agama

  • Nia Kurniati Syam Prodi KPI-UNISBA
  • Deddy Mulyana Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi -UNPAD
  • Atie Rachmiatie Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi-UNISBA
  • Pawit M. Yusuf Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi UNPAD

Abstract

This research is a field study on the phenomenon of interfaith marriage, using subjective paradigm-Phenomenology interpretive method and theory of symbolic interaction to identify the types of motifs, adaptation and religious symbols in interfaith marriage. Data collection techniques natural setting, observation, interviews and documentation. The research objective is to explore apamotif interfaith marriage, how adaptations in marriage and religious symbols on families of different religions. The results showed that the pair families of different religions have a motive of love, appearance, comfort, education and the economy, in the adaptation of the marital interfaith marriage portion has a communication climate of consensus, where children married couples of different religions to adapt among married couples that have implications the decision to follow the religion of one parent and or choice in child later handed over to an adult. The authority of the couple in the election decision religion children found their own authority as a husband and wife having legitimacy, had a religious reference. In connection with religious symbols for families of different religions is not a sacred thing. Interfaith families have a high tolerance. Knowledge and strengthening the values ​​of their respective religions encourage the growth of tolerance and high empathy.

References

BeeBe. Steven A. 1996. Interperpersonal Communication, Library of Congress Cataloging-in Publication Data.
Bugin, M. Burhan 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
Bonar Hutapea. 2011.Penelitiannya mengenai Sikap Mahasiswa terhadap perkawinan berbeda agama, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, Vol. 16 No. 01, pp 103.
Bisin, Topa & Verdie.2004.Jurnal Ekonomi & Politik.(pp: 615-664)
Bryan S. Turner, 2012. Religion and Social Theory, terjemah :Relasi Agama dan Teori Sosial Kontemporer, Inyiak Ridwan Muzir, IRCiSoD, Jojakarta.
Cresswell, K.J. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design:Choosing among, Five Traditions, London, Sage Publications.
Coldwell, K.J. 2004. Religious Effects on Level of Family Functioning, Southwest, Missauri State.
DeVito, A. Josep. 1996. Messages: Building Intepersonal Communication Skills 3rd, ed, Harper Collins.
______________, 1995. The Interpersonal Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family, New York: Addition Macmillan.
_______________. 2001. The Interpersonal Communication Book. New York: Addition Wesley Longman Inc., 9Th edition.
Denzim. K. Norman, 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Reseacrh. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Effendy, Onong. 1995. Ilmu Komunikasi teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
_________________, 1989. Dinamika Komunikasi, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Ficham, FD.2004. Communication in Marrige, in Vangeltisty, LA. (Ed).
Khamami Zada, UIN, Jurnal Ahkam, 2013. Arus Utama Perdebatan Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama (Hukum perkawinan beda agama di Yaman Utara, Yordania, Aljazair, dan Irak) Vol. XIII, No. 1, Januari, pp 235-255.
Gudykunst, W.B. & Stella Ting Toomey, 1988. Culture and InterpersonalCommunication. New Burry Park, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
__________________, (2003). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. New Burry Park, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication
Hubberman, A. Michael & Milles B. Mattew. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press.
KJ Veeger. (1985), Realitas Sosial, Refleksi Filsafat Sosial atas Hubungan Individu – Masyarakat dalam Cakrawala Sejarah Sosiologi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Knapp, M.L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn and Balcon.
Knox, Zusman & Daniel,2002. Sikap Mahasiswa terhadap perkawinan berbeda agama. Jurnal. .East Carolina dan Indiana University(pp.:445-448).
Kuswarno, E. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi: Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman dan Contoh Penelitian, Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.
Maleong, Lexy J. 2006. Metodologi Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Masykur, Ali. 2005. Artikel Ilmiah, tentang Pola Komunikasi Antar Umat Beragama, Banten: IAIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin.
Misiak, Henryk & Virginia Staudt Sexton (terj). 2005. Psikologi Fenomenology: Ekstensial dan Humanistik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mead, George Herbert. 1987. Mind, Self and Society, Landon: The University Chicaco
Moran, Dermot. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Mulyana, Deddy. 2001. Pegantar 2002.Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Rosda Karya, Bandung.
_______________, 2005. Komunikasi Efektif: Suatu Penekanan Lintas Budaya, RosdaKarya, Bandung.
_______________, 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya bandung.
________________,2010.Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma baru IlmuKomunikasi dan Ilmu sosial, Rosdakarya, Bandung.
________________,2015.Komunikasi Lintas Budaya, edisi Revisi, Bandung. Rosdakarya
Osborne, Cecil G. 1988. The Art of Understanding Your Mate. Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House Grand Rapids.
Petts,R.J & Knoester, C. 2007. Parent’s Religionus Heterogamy and children’sWell-Being, Journal for the Sciencetific Study of Religion 46/3:373-389.
Rashid Ridho, 2002. Praktik ritual Keagamaan perspektif Epistemologis, Yogya: LESFI
Ruth Shonle Cavan, 1970. Concepts and Terminology in Interreligious Marriage, Journal Scientific Study of Religion, Vol 9 Number 4/WINER 1970. Depertement of Illinois University.
Vertrees Malherbe, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Marrch, 2008. Vol.36, No. I, pp. 5-25.
Published
2017-03-30
How to Cite
SYAM, Nia Kurniati et al. Adaptasi Perkawinan Lintas Agama. Jurnal Lentera : Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan dan Teknologi, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 37-59, mar. 2017. ISSN 2540-7767. Available at: <http://ejournal.staimnglawak.ac.id/index.php/lentera/article/view/51>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2017.
Section
Articles